The Elephant in the Room
In SE Asia, elephants are as much a part of the typical "tourist experience" as temples and full-moon parties. But for us animal-loving outsiders, it's a contradictory and confusing industry. In Thailand, we saw a lot of the bad side - over-tourism enabled by unethical operators who care about the almighty dollar (or Baht) more than the elephant's health or happiness. We also got a small glimpse of the good side - tourism, done right(ish), as a way to ensure an elephant's place in a society that has domesticated elephants for industry for centuries.
Still curious (and conveniently in Laos, the "land of 1,000,000 elephants"), we decided to go spend more time with our favorite gentle giants to get the scoop. Counter to Thailand, we had no problem choosing the "operator" we wanted to visit. The Elephant Conservation Center in Sayabouri Province, in partnership with Elephant Asia, is home to the first elephant hospital, breeding program and nursery in Laos and just opened its doors to tourists in 2012 as a way to monetarily support its efforts. The 180-acre sanctuary is set on some of the most beautiful land we have seen in Asia - and matches up to pretty much everywhere else. And, no one knows about it (yet). They don't advertise through the hundreds of travel agents in Luang Prabang, there is no shuttle that comes to fetch you in the city - it's a fend-for-yourself four-hour local bus ride out to the nearest town, a tuk tuk drive to a ferry dock and a boat ride across a glassy reservoir - and they are buried online behind the more popular elephant camps, ethnic trekking and tour opportunities in Laos. Some of that is on purpose - tourism is a means to an end for them, not a money maker. They want small groups (maximum of twelve, I think) and minimal impact for the elephants. And, some of it is just because they are new at this whole tourism thing.
We were searching for the truth, or at least a little insight, but after three days and two nights, we were still scratching our heads. Not because the ECC didn't give good information - they did - but because the reality is complicated and hard to swallow.
To start with, there's the staggering reality that Laos, once the land of 1,000,000 elephants is now home to fewer than 1,000, with nearly fifty percent of those domesticated and employed either in tourism or logging. And, the death rate currently exceeds the birth rate two to one. The simple fact is that if something isn't done now, elephants could be completely extinct in Laos in the next few centuries.
Which brings us to hard reality number two. The immediate solutions can't just focus on a better future for elephants in Laos. They have to make sure there is a future at all, which means living with a few things that seem counter to the cause. For example, the breeding program at ECC offers owners of domesticated animals - usually tour operators or loggers - the opportunity to breed their elephants with a male at the center knowing full-well that the baby will also be employed in those industries. They stipulate that the mother and baby stay at the center until they're healthy enough to leave and actually pay the mahout to live on site with their elephants during the late-pregnancy and early months after the birth. This process is groundbreaking in Laos, typically takes two years and drastically improves the chances of a healthy life for both mother and baby. But when the time comes, they are both back to work. It just doesn't seem right. Another example... The ECC provides mobile clinics and mahout training to remote logging villages in Laos, providing health care and best-practices in hopes the elephants' quality of life improves, but without changing its circumstances. Wait.. What?! These facets of the program were absolutely mind-boggling to us. How can ECC support logging? Domestication from birth? Don't they want the elephants to be "free"? Or at least retired from a life of forced labor?
The answer is of course, yes, ideally elephants would be frolicking freely in the wild without a care in the world outside of meals and mating. But, hard realities number three and four show why it's not that easy. First of all, there are people involved. Whole communities of people whose livelihoods depend on elephant labor. Families and children who would be without shelter, food and clothing if not for it. Secondly, there is currently no comparable alternative for the logging communities and the government has been unwilling to help change that fact, despite the hardship of logging on the elephants and the environment. In fact, the government seems to not only ignore, but actually impede progress, going so far as seizing NGO equipment for personal profit, limiting state contracts and funding to the bare minimum, and regulating private donation and grant receipts in the extreme. To complicate matters more, if the government were to wake up tomorrow and do what we're all thinking they should do - enact legislation against logging and provide new industry for the loggers - the elephants would be left behind in the "progress" with no where to go.
Which brings us to the fifth and final hard truth. The near-future alternative is tourism. Just like they've experienced in Thailand (where logging is prohibited by the government), land is in short supply, domesticated elephants are without skills to survive in the wild even if land wasn't an issue, and protected areas cost money. A lot of money. Without massive, most likely unrealistic support from both the government and the private sector, these elephants will have to earn their keep. And, as we've already discussed, the tourism industry is also riddled with complication.
The good news is that there are good people trying to do it right. Programs like ECC's focus on education and understanding versus cheap thrills and a quick pay check. And, it seems like travelers are becoming more conscious of how their choices can affect change. With continued efforts from both sides and some massive changes in government outlook and outreach, the future for elephants in SE Asia will not only be ensured, but look a lot brighter. Even without the rose-colored glasses.